You work with large files or NAS
dupeGuru times out on terabyte-scale datasets. DuoBolt finishes the same scan in under 2 minutes, even on cold, spun-down NAS drives.
dupeGuru is one of the most well-known duplicate finders. But its performance on large datasets falls far behind modern tools. DuoBolt is up to 21× faster in head-to-head benchmarks — and doesn’t time out on NAS volumes where dupeGuru gives up.
All tests ran on Apple Silicon M1 Pro, macOS 26.1, with cleared caches and back-to-back execution. Lower times are better. Timeout = exceeded 15 minutes without completing.
| Dataset | DuoBolt | dupeGuru | DuoBolt advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Projects (13.17 GB) | 1s | 11s | 11× faster |
| Codebase (37.92 GB) | 3s | 63s | 21× faster |
| Codebase + Library (large) | 24s | Timeout | — |
| NAS Cold — 1.01 TB | 64s | 142s | 2.2× faster |
| NAS Warm — 1.01 TB | 20s | 59s | 3× faster |
Key takeaway: dupeGuru timed out entirely on the large Codebase + Library dataset and both NAS tests were multiple times slower. DuoBolt scanned a terabyte of NAS data in 64 seconds cold, 20 seconds warm.
| Feature | DuoBolt | dupeGuru |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | macOS, Windows | macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Price | Free tier · $34.99 one-time | Free (open source) |
| Sold as a subscription | No | No |
| Hashing | BLAKE3 | MD5 / SHA-256 |
| Similar photos | Yes, with AI Curation | Yes (fuzzy match) |
| Adjustable similarity | Yes — five bands, Identical to Loosely similar | Yes — a filter-hardness slider |
| Reads RAW directly | Yes — CR2/CR3, NEF, ARW, RAF, ORF, RW2, DNG and more | Not documented |
| HEIC / AVIF | Yes (Windows needs two free Store extensions for previews) | Not documented |
| APFS clone awareness | Yes | No |
| NAS / network drives | Yes | Slow / timeouts |
| Rescan cache | Yes — hashes and thumbnails, separate local and network thresholds | Yes (picture cache) |
| Re-runnable scan history | Yes — each scan’s full setup is stored and can run again | — |
| Safe deletion | Trash, archive, or copy | Direct delete |
| Review before removing | Mandatory Review Selection step | — |
| Protected folders | Yes | — |
| Recovers permanent deletions | Yes — rebuilt from a byte-identical copy, with the original dates and tags | — |
| Account / telemetry | None | None |
| Active development | Yes | Minimal (maintenance mode) |
You work with large files or NAS
dupeGuru times out on terabyte-scale datasets. DuoBolt finishes the same scan in under 2 minutes, even on cold, spun-down NAS drives.
You need speed on codebases
DuoBolt is 21× faster than dupeGuru on a 37 GB codebase. On diverse file structures with many small files, the gap is largest.
You want safe, auditable cleanup
Deletion history and Trash-based deletion mean you can always undo. dupeGuru deletes directly without a safety net.
dupeGuru uses older hash algorithms (MD5/SHA-256) and a single-threaded scan model. DuoBolt was built from the ground up around:
The result is that DuoBolt’s performance advantage grows with dataset size — exactly where dupeGuru’s single-threaded bottleneck becomes most painful.
Full Benchmark Results
All five datasets compared against dupeGuru, Czkawka, and Gemini 2 with full methodology.
Download DuoBolt
Free to scan on macOS and Windows, with a free tier that also cleans.